I'm currently trying to translate a C program to Rust.

我正在尝试将一个C程序翻译成Rust。

The C programm has following structures (boiled down to MRE):

C程序具有以下结构(归结为MRE)：

typedef struct {
    bool isActive;
    uint32_t value;
} tMyInnerStruct;

typedef struct {
    tMyInnerStruct inner1;
    tMyInnerStruct inner2;
} tMyStruct;

and in a function I would do the following pointer magic:

在一个函数中，我将执行以下指针魔术：

void myFunction()
{
    tMyStruct myStruct = initMyStuct();
    tMyInnerStruct *pActiveInner = &myStruct.inner1;
    // Do something with pActiveInner (pointing to inner1), like setting value...
    changeActiveStruct(&myStruct, &pActiveInner);
    // Do something with pActiveInner (pointing to inner2), like setting value...
}

void changeActiveStruct( tMyStruct *pMyStruct, tMyInnerStruct **ppActiveInner )
{
    if ( &pMyStruct->inner1 == *ppActiveInner ) {
        *ppActiveInner = &pMyStruct->inner2;
    } else {
        *ppActiveInner = &pMyStruct->inner1;
    }
}

No my question is: How would I achieve the same in Rust?

不，我的问题是：我将如何在铁锈中实现同样的目标？

What I've tried so far in Rust:

到目前为止，我在《铁锈》中尝试过的是：

#[derive(Default)]
struct MyInnerStruct {
    is_active: bool,
    value: u32,
}

#[derive(Default)]
struct MyStruct {
    inner1: MyInnerStruct,
    inner2: MyInnerStruct,
}

impl MyStruct {
    fn change_active(&mut self, active: &MyInnerStruct) -> &mut MyInnerStruct {
        if &self.inner1 as *const _ == active as *const _ {
            &mut self.inner2
        } else {
            &mut self.inner1
        }
    }
}

fn main() {
    let mut my_struct: MyStruct = Default::default();
    let mut active = &mut my_struct.inner1;
    active = my_struct.change_active(active);
    // The above complains, that my_struct cannot be borrowed mutable more than once...
}

You can accompilsh the same thing by using a pointer as argument instead of a reference. Because of the order that arguments and the receiver are evaluated in, you have to convert to a pointer ahead of the call and can't do it in the parameter list but this works:

您可以通过使用指针作为参数而不是引用来编译相同的内容。由于参数和接收器的求值顺序，您必须转换为调用之前的指针，并且不能在参数列表中这样做，但这是可行的：

impl MyStruct {
    fn change_active(&mut self, active: *const MyInnerStruct) -> &mut MyInnerStruct {
        if &self.inner1 as *const _ == active {
            &mut self.inner2
        } else {
            &mut self.inner1
        }
    }
}

fn main() {
    let mut my_struct: MyStruct = Default::default();
    let mut active = &mut my_struct.inner1; 

    active = { 
        let active = active as *const _;
        my_struct.change_active(active)
    };
}

Playground

操场

_{Minor detail, change_active does no longer seem like an apropriate name since the Rust version doesn't actually change active maybe new_active or something else still is a better name for the method}

次要细节，CHANGE_ACTIVE看起来不再像是一个合适的名称，因为Rust版本实际上不会更改ACTIVE可能是NEW_ACTIVE或其他名称仍然是该方法的更好名称