I was looking at Bun Official Site there i noticed that they are claiming, bun is nearly 3 times faster than nodejs.
Is it really true or it is just a marketing strategy to promote bun over nodeJS?

我看了一下Bun官网，我注意到他们声称BUN比NodeJS快近3倍。这是真的吗，还是只是一种营销策略，推广BUN而不是NodeJS？

Please let me know your thoughts.

请让我知道你的想法。

I am trying to do bun install in my CRA react app for checking bun's performance

我正在尝试在我的CRA Reaction应用程序中安装BUN，以检查BUN的性能

bun install v0.1.4
  🔍 @sentry/react [1608/1608]

it's maybe faster than node, but I think its not yet ready for everyday/production use.

它可能比Node更快，但我认为它还没有准备好用于日常/生产使用。

maybe I am with WSL (Ubuntu) coz of that its not always working properly for me

也许我用的是WSL(Ubuntu)，因为它并不总是适合我

I did quite some comparing between Node und Bun and the results are very mixed. Complex tasks like a huge Webpack project resulted in Node being 10% faster than Bun and express based servers resulted in Bun being 50% faster than Node.
As always: it depends!
What I actually like the most with Bun is btw how easy it is to run TypeScript code ;-)

我对Node和Bun做了相当多的比较，结果非常好坏参半。复杂的任务，如庞大的webpack项目，导致Node比Bun快10%，而基于Express的服务器使Bun比Node快50%。一如既往：视情况而定！实际上，我最喜欢Bun的是它运行打字代码是多么容易；-)

Yes it is true. BunJS is actually faster than NodeJS. I wrote a tree-walk interpreter in JavaScript and ran it using both Node and BunJS. NodeJS took ~1 seconds were as Bun took ~0.73s the first time and even less the second time:

是的，这是真的。实际上，BunJS比NodeJS更快。我用JavaScript编写了一个树遍历解释器，并使用Node和BunJS运行它。NodeJS用时约1秒，而Bun第一次用时约0.73秒，第二次用时更短：

In this case, the increase is not much as the code was already quite optimised but for a server, Bun can be exponentially faster.

在这种情况下，增加的不是很多，因为代码已经相当优化，但对于服务器，Bun可以指数级地更快。