I'd like convert string to ConditionalOperator, few sample :
我想将字符串转换为ConditionalOperator,几个示例:
- "and" to &&
- "or" to ||
- "greatherthan" to >=
- "contains" to .Contains
Something like this :
大概是这样的:
public static class Extension
{
public static Operator ConditionalOperator(this string logic)
{
switch (logic)
{
case "and": return // return && conditionaloperator
case "or": return // return || conditionaloperator
case "greatherthan": return // return >= conditionaloperator
}
}
}
The second argument is not all the time a string but can be int, double, bool, ...
第二个参数并不总是字符串,但可以是int、Double、bool、...
I'd like build something like : ConditionalOperator("==", "StringToSearch")
return a Func<>
我希望构建如下内容:ConditionalOperator(“==”,“StringToSearch”)返回一个Func<>
Do you have an idea how to do this ?
你知道怎么做吗?
Thanks,
谢谢,
Update 1, to clarify:
I received a list of object "Filter"
更新1,澄清:我收到了一个对象“Filter”的列表
The "FilterOperator" all possible values for a CondtionalOperator.
“FilterOperator”CondtionalOperator的所有可能值。
更多回答
What is Operator
or Opertor
? What is the second argument?
什么是操作员或操作员?第二个论点是什么?
I think this post might be of help to you.
我想这篇文章可能会对你有所帮助。
@StephenRoss I read this post but I don't understand where "Operator" comes from Operator.LessThan<T>;
@斯蒂芬罗斯我读了这篇帖子,但我不明白“操作员”从何而来。
@shingo it's a typo
@Shingo这是个打字错误
How would you do Contains
with an int
? Or a bool
?
你会如何用一个整型来处理包含呢?还是一只野猪?
优秀答案推荐
You can use generics
您可以使用泛型
public static bool Operator(string logic, T x, T y) where T : IComparable<T>
{
var compare = Comparer<T>.Default.Compare(x, y);
return logic switch
{
">" => compare > 0,
"<" => compare < 0,
"==" => compare == 0,
_ => throw new Exception("invalid logic"),
};
}
Optionally you could pass an explicit IComparer
或者,您可以传递一个显式的ICompeller
public static bool Operator(string logic, T x, T y, IComparer<T> comparer)
{
var compare = comparer.Compare(x, y);
return logic switch
{
">" => compare > 0,
"<" => compare < 0,
"==" => compare == 0,
_ => throw new Exception("invalid logic"),
};
}
To return a Func<T, T, bool>
you can just do
要返回Func
,您只需执行以下操作
public static Func<T, T, bool> Operator(string logic, T x, T y, IComparer<T> comparer)
{
return logic switch
{
">" => (x, y) => comparer.Compare(x, y) > 0,
"<" => (x, y) => comparer.Compare(x, y) < 0,
"==" => (x, y) => comparer.Compare(x, y) == 0,
_ => throw new Exception("invalid logic"),
};
}
For string.Contains
you should probably make a separate overload just for string
, as that cannot be genericized.
包含您可能应该只为字符串创建一个单独的重载,因为它不能泛化。
public static class Extension
{
public static Boolean Operator(this string logic, int x, int y)
{
switch (logic)
{
case ">": return x > y;
case "<": return x < y;
case "==": return x == y;
default: throw new Exception("invalid logic");
}
}
}
Source
来源
更多回答
if there is Contains for a string ?
如果一个字符串有包含呢?
I don't understand your question. Yes there is a Contains
function, but that's not what you asked, and it wouldn't make sense to use that with generics. Perhaps you should make a separate overload just for string
.
我不明白你的问题。是的,确实有一个包含函数,但这不是您所要求的,在泛型中使用它是没有意义的。也许您应该为字符串创建一个单独的重载。
I updated the question to clarify. It's more create an expression.
我更新了问题以澄清。更重要的是创造一种表达方式。
I saw this code but it's not all the time int but can be string, double, long, ...
我看到了这段代码,但它并不总是int,而是可以是字符串、双精度、长整型...
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!